Just to answer the question without doing a full AAR...
I took his Pistol II class last spring and I'd certainly train with him again, given the opportunity. He's a very good teacher with a respectable background, took an obvious, vested interest in his students, was patient, very knowledgeable, and, for what it's worth, entertaining. The curriculum was nothing particularly mind blowing or radical, but I wasn't expecting that, and it didn't need to be. All very solid, usable stuff. I felt I left with usable, relative info and some things to think about/skills to work on. Without knowing your needs, skill level, or expectations, It's difficult to say if his classes are for you, but I doubt you'd be disappointed with the training.