SmElly
Regular Member
Bear with me guys, I'm just some guy on the internet trying to learn more about martial force. So, I'm going to throw out some statements in search for input from folks that know more than I do.
1. The only hits that matter at close distance are heart and head (right?)
A lung or gut shot at CQB distance doesnt mean sh*t (right?). If I havent stopped the bad guy's trigger finger from working, I havent eliminated the threat (see modcast clip 16-1)
2. A heart/frontal cortex shot from a pistol round is just as good as a heart/frontal cortex shot from a rifle round (right?). A hole is a hole is a hole (right?). The threat is dead as dead can be?
3.If point 1 and 2 are correct, wouldnt a pistol caliber long gun be more optimal than a rifle? (lower recoil, meaning faster opportunities to drive holes through the heart/brain?)
Help me out here , I'm looking for criticisms.
1. The only hits that matter at close distance are heart and head (right?)
A lung or gut shot at CQB distance doesnt mean sh*t (right?). If I havent stopped the bad guy's trigger finger from working, I havent eliminated the threat (see modcast clip 16-1)
2. A heart/frontal cortex shot from a pistol round is just as good as a heart/frontal cortex shot from a rifle round (right?). A hole is a hole is a hole (right?). The threat is dead as dead can be?
3.If point 1 and 2 are correct, wouldnt a pistol caliber long gun be more optimal than a rifle? (lower recoil, meaning faster opportunities to drive holes through the heart/brain?)
Help me out here , I'm looking for criticisms.