Observations On The Effect Of Parallax Error When Shooting With An Aimpoint Comp M5 And A Trijicon MRO

Molon

Newbie
Observations On The Effect Of Parallax Error
When Shooting With An Aimpoint Comp M5 And A Trijicon MRO




Some manufacturers of red-dot sights have made claims that their red-dot sights are “parallax free“. Most of us are already aware that this is simply not true at all distances. Inherent parallax error with a red-dot sight is typically greatest at CQB distances (MOA wise) and decreases as the distance to the target increases.

In this ballistic exercise we’ll be looking at the amount of parallax error occuring during objective, controlled, live-fire testing at the distances of 7 yards, 15 yards, 25 yards and 50 yards when shooting with an Aimpoint Comp M5 and a Trijicon MRO mounted on a precision AR-15. The Aimpoint Comp M5 has a 2 MOA red dot, as does the Trijicon MRO.

All shooting for this exercise was conducted from my bench-rest set-up using one of my precision AR-15s. This AR-15 has a 20” Lothar
Walther barrel with a 223 Wylde chamber and 1:8” twist and it routinely produces 0.75 MOA 10-shot groups at 100 yards (with a high magnification scope). The ammunition used for this exercise was one of my match-grade hand-loads topped with the Sierra 52 grain MatchKing. Wind conditions on the range were monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.

benchrest_krieger_rifle_02_JPG-1297383.jpg





The barrel . . .

lothar_walther_barrel_21_resized-1297387.jpg





lothar_barrel_crown_02_resized-1297385.jpg





lothar_walther_barrel_free_floated_05-1297388.jpg





10-shot group at 100 yards . . .

lothar_barrel__control_group_77_smk_meas-1297384.jpg





The Wind Probe . . .


wind_probe_25_resized-1297397.jpg



The Details


The methodology for this ballistic exercise was as follows . . .

Shooting from the bench-rest set-up with the Aimpoint Comp M5 atop the precision AR-15 at the initial distance of 7 yards, an 8-shot control group was fired with the red-dot centered in the sight window. Next, an 8-shot parallax test-group was fired in the following manner:

2 shots fired with the red-dot positioned in the extreme 12 o’clock position of the sight window.

2 shots fired with the red-dot positioned in the extreme 3 o’clock position of the sight window.

2 shots fired with the red-dot positioned in the extreme 6 o’clock position of the sight window.

2 shots fired with the red-dot positioned in the extreme 9 o’clock position of the sight window.


Additional 8-shot parallax test-groups were then fired sequentially at 15 yards, 25 yards and 50 yards in the manner described above. This simple methodology is illustrated in the two pics shown below. The solid black dot on the target was the point-of-aim.



The 8-shot control group at 7 yards.


8_shot_control_group_at_7_yards_1b_resiz-1297684.jpg





The 8-shot parallax test-group at 7 yards.


8_shot_parallax_test_group_at_7_yards_01-1297685.jpg






Aimpoint Comp M5 Results

The 8-shot control group fired at 7 yards had an extreme spread of 0.039”, which at 7 yards is 0.53 MOA. The extreme spreads of the parallax test-groups are shown in the table below.




ampoint_compm5_02_resized_b-1297942.jpg



Trijicon MRO Results

trijicon_mro_RDS_21-1315992.jpg



I repeated the ballistic exercise described above using a 2nd generation Trijicon MRO with a 2 MOA red dot. The results are shown in the table below.



trijicon_mro_parallax-1315991.jpg



I also conducted the 50 yard portion of the parallax test using another 2nd generation Trijicon MRO with a 2 MOA red dot. The results were nearly identical to that of the first MRO. The extreme spread of the 8-shot parallax test-group was 7.46”, which at 50 yards is 14.3 MOA.


Comparisons

The tables and graphs below show the results from both the Aimpoint Comp M5 and the Trijicon MRO, side-by-side, for comparison.

Results in minutes of angle . . .


parallax_comparison_table_in_MOA_21b-1315988.jpg



parallax_error_graf_in_MOA_logarithmic_3-1315990.jpg



Results in inches . . .

parallax_comparison_table_01_in_inches-1315987.jpg




parallax_error_graf_in_inches_polynomial-1315989.jpg





…..
 

DerekS

Newbie
Awesome detail. Great information. I wanted to add my personal experience with this. Where i train at i was getting crap for my old RR and Primary Arms aim point clone, both of which performed flawlessly out to 150 yards in Carbine classes btw. I bought a light weight Aero gun and put a MRO on it. We zeroed it from a pack on a table and then confirmed with irons. Showed up to my first class with it and I was missing a lot at 100 and 150 yards on two-thirds man size steel. This was moving to shoot standing, kneeling, prone, barrier. I was so pissed i almost quit the class midway through. It was pouring rain and cold so i had a good excuse. I decided to tough it out and focused on cheek weld and putting the dot dead center of the lens. This helped, but it was still very, very frustrating. I ended the class using irons. This is not a cheap optic. After my frustrations the instructor at Apex Defense Group where I was training at did a round up of optics and he saw up to 14 inches of parallax at 100 yards with the MRO. I thinkthe winner on Paralax was the Aim Points. This pretty much mirrors your findings. This was not an old MRO, i bought this last spring after they "fixed" the glass from a previous issue. I am building a 9mm PCC, it will probably be a house gun for the wife. The MRO is going to go on it. It should be fine up close.

Derek
 
Top