I understand about mistakes being made. I believe police should be held to a high standard, and seeing how QI plays out, that isn't holding the ones who make these mistakes to that level. A hvac company doesn't have a stipulation in court, to where they can be immune unless that right has been clearly established. Meaning, unless there is a case with the same details out there, QI can be imposed.
Which is why I find it funny, people like the admin here, assumed on what I had issues with the comparison. Instead of asking and discussing, he goes for "As usual with QI discussions, the people who decry it do not understand what it actually is." while he is actually showing how little he knows concerning the subject. I am finding that to be a common theme among the "staff" on this forum.
There needs to be a clear law regarding the subject, not case law. For the interpretations have changed and it needs to be one set standard. I feel a baseline needs to be, if a citizen can be charged for their actions, so should the police.
) can make honest mistakes. I think that's what the analogy was supposed to show. Yea, in many ways, the police are not like HVAC installers and the government is not like a private company. But they're all staffed by humans, and humans make honest mistakes.