Kit - Using it, Fighting Order

22F

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Full article with lots of pretty pictures can be found at:



Kit - Using it, Fighting Order



The previous two articles in this series speaking of the general over-arching concepts (seen HERE) and our Third Line, or Marching Order (seen HERE). Now, let us continue the saga to discuss the Second Line or Fighting/Patrol Order.



As has been covered in earlier articles:

– Survive with what is in your pockets (1st Line)

– Fight with what is in your webbing (2nd Line)

– Live with what is in your pack (3rd Line)

.

We have previously examined the large pack, which provides our daily living equipment (seen HERE). Now we can delve into equipment that is needed to fight or achieve the mission.

As previously mentioned in the overview article (seen HERE), there is a fair bit of overlap between each level.

.

The Second Line equipment could have relevance to other end-users and industries. Off the top of my head, I can envision such end-users as hunters, photographers, and other outdoor professionals that require mission essential equipment without the large pack.

.

It should be noted, that I am speaking from the perspective of an Australian light infantryman who spent significant time with non-traditional roles in a mounted capacity.

It should also be noted that the ADF use the term “webbing” for our second or fighting order as a catch-all phrase for any Load Bearing Harness/Equipment (LBH or LBE) for fighting load.

Traditional belt mounted webbing consisting of a series of pouches hanging off a belt with some form of shoulder harness is the staple form of fighting order. In essence, it has not progressed that far from the original format from the Napoleonic era. It has taken a very long time for us in the ADF to adopt other forms of LBE for our fighting order due to a couple of factors:

Institutional inertia, and our environment of hot, arid or humid conditions. Belt webbing is often the optimal solution for many of our operational requirements.

.

I have very little time using combat body armour, so my perspective is going to be somewhat dated nowadays. The modern requirements for that Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is going to present its own difficulties and planning factors, but the principles I suggest should be capable of being applied universally.

.

Alright then, let us move onto fighting order itself.

Traditionally and doctrinally, one's webbing (or fighting order) is required to carry some essential kit.

Webbing needs to carry the following:

– first line ammunition issue for the primary weapon

– Supplies for the wearer to survive up to 24 hours without a pack.

.

Obviously, this is entirely dependent upon mission, climate and terrain.

There are some issues with this requirement for 24 hours of sustainment away from the patrol pack. Principal amongst them is the classic tendency to over pack for the situation.

.

There are several real-world considerations that need to be considered. Fighting order LBE needs to be minimalist in bulk, whilst maximising accessibility and carrying capacity. It needs to be comfortable, without retaining heat. It needs to be light, without sacrificing durability.

The wearer needs to be able to run, crawl, climb and fit through narrow openings or close terrain with minimal snags.

In short, one's webbing often becomes like a very intimate second skin carrying all our mission essential equipment.

.

With many things in life, it can also be observed that experience and training levels have a direct impact upon loads carried and their size.

.

For the Australian Army, our doctrinal webbing loadout for a rifleman in training is:

5x magazines, F88 (Steyr AUG)

Cleaning kit, F88

Bayonet

Toggle rope

2x 1-quart canteens

1x cup, canteen (cup with folding handle that slips over the canteen)

1x 24-hour Combat Ration Pack (CRP)

Raincoat and/or jumper (the old Howard Green)

Knife, fork, and spoon set

Fold-up hexamine stove and fuel blocks

Millbank filter

Spare radio batteries (AN/PRC-77)

Shell dressing (Israeli bandage)

.

This is a load that can be somewhat bulky and heavy.

I found that some items would be pared down and reduced as much as possible, to allow others to be increased or have equipment added.

My load as a rifleman in a Land Command unit, outside of Training Command was outlined below:

5-7x magazines, F88 (Dependent upon unit and role. In a reconnaissance role, our SOP's dictated up to 10-14x magazines.)

1x 200rd belt of 5.56mm link ammunition for the Section’s Light Support Weapons (LSW)

2x F1 Fragmentation Hand Grenades

1x smoke grenade

Cleaning kit, F88

Bayonet

Toggle rope

2x 1-quart canteens

2x cups, canteen (one for eating/drinking, the other for shaving/washing)

Millbank filter

Hexamine stove, slip over (a picture of which can be seen below) and blocks of fuel.

1x meal (tin or bag of food)

Brew kit (teabags, sugar, cordial sachets)

Snacks (often high energy items such as beef jerky)

Night vision tube (Ninox) and head harness

2x shell dressings (Israeli bandages)



Nowadays, the fighting load will also have personal communications such as MBITR and PRR radio sets.

.

Let's talk then about how to carry all that gear for patrol and battle then.

There are several types of platforms available to carry all this fighting load.

We have already briefly discussed belt webbing.



Belt webbing is a traditional setup of a belt around the hips supported by a suspender harness. The basic rig has been in use since Napoleonic times. Often it is a good generic solution to fighting load carriage, it suffers from poor integration with modern hip loading belts as found on quality patrol packs.



Chest webbing (or Battle Bra in Australian vernacular) is a one-piece pancake structure with harness straps to keep the load higher on the chest. As seen HERE with my previous review of the ATS chest rig.

Equipment can be more easily accessible than other rigs, but there is often less real estate and carrying capacity. Many in mounted roles or working in built up areas prefer chest rigs.

.

Split-front chest rigs (such as the Smamit rig seen HERE) are my personal favourite for a general-purpose rig. It gives a good combination of accessibility, comfort, and integration with other equipment such as the patrol pack harness.

.

A combat vest, or Fighting Load Carrier as our American allies describe it, is a larger and vest-like garment that offers almost as much carrying capacity as belt webbing, but carried more comfortably closer to the body. The major drawback can be heat retention and integration with patrol packs, depending upon set-up.

.

Alright, now that we've spoken of the different platforms, let's speak of the important stuff.

We will talk more detail of setting up belt webbing in a later article down the track. But for now, basic principles across any platform will be discussed.

.

There are several general principles that need to be applied to the fighting load. These aren't hard and fast rules, but these are what I consider should be analysed to meet the mission requirements.



1. The fighting load needs to be simple. It needs to be comfortable, because it is often worn for hours/days on end.

2. The rig itself must be considered an integral part of the whole load bearing system and should be compatible with the large patrol pack.

3. Minimalist equipment to be carried (do not carry the kitchen sink) – this helps reduce weight, increase comfort and reduce snags.

4. Placement of equipment pouches for easy access yet not restrictive to movement, such as crawling, running and climbing.

5. A gap on the centreline can allow one to go prone without raising profile too much OR keeping pouches on the front as low profile as possible.

6. Ammunition pouches should be accessible by the non-master/support hand for rapid reloads.

7. Immediate IFAK/trauma treatment should be accessible by both hands.

8. Hand grenades should be stowed on the dominant side. For the simple reason that such items really should not be excessively handled for safety and operational reasons.

9. Pouches for administrative items (eg. Canteens, snacks, and other items) should have silent closure systems.

10. Bayonet/knife placement needs to be accessible by an appropriate hand, ie. Bayonet by the support hand, and a knife by the master hand. And a word of warning, kids: hanging knives upside down is an invitation to lose it or present a really cool toy to people who may not like you too much. So do not do it. Stow your knife the right way up as the Good Lord intended, so you can use your arms and elbows to aid in securing it against potential grabbing situations.

.

When in doubt about placement of equipment on the load bearing fighting harness, another great concept to consider is the Diver’s Triangle.

The Diver’s Triangle is an inverted triangle from the point of the shoulders down to the umbilicus.

This triangle is where lifesaving equipment (such as tourniquet and shell dressings) should be stored that will allow access by either hand in any position.

Here, we have a picture from our friends Whiskey Delta Gulf (they can be found HERE or HERE) demonstrating the Diver’s Triangle:





Outlined below is how I have my split-front chest rig set-up and where items are located.

Just like most of my “How-to” articles, this is “A” way to setup your fighting load/webbing. It’s certainly not intended to be “THE” way, but it’s “MY” way…

How it sits on me:



Right Hand Side:



Ammunition

2x shell dressings

An 8x21mm monocular

Roll of electrical tape

Mosquito repellent

Spoon

1 quart canteen

Cups, canteen

Canteen cup stove.

An ATS Low Profile Medical Insert (Review seen HERE) with brew kit (beef jerky, teabags, sugar, fire-starter, matches in a water-proof container, hexamine fuel tablets, toilet paper, can opener, and water sterilisation tablets)



Left Hand Side:



Tourniquet

Ammunition

Fixed blade knife

Small torch

Canteen

Roll of hootchie-cord (not shown)

ATS pouch insert with IFAK

In the future, a small UHF radio will be carried in this area when budget permits.

.

Alright then, we have covered how to set up the fighting load, and conducted some analysis about what should be carried. It’s time now to consider usage.



In general usage, the contents of the webbing - especially food and water – should be consumed after the large pack, or should be replenished from the large pack as soon as possible.

The reason for this is simple: should the large pack have to be dropped, or operating without the large pack for any length of time, one is self-sufficient for as long as possible.



This is also a nice time to mention pouch closures and my recommendations. In this age of modular pouches, it is worth thinking about closure methods and security of stowed equipment.

.

In general terms, I prefer my non-ammunition (ie. General equipment) pouches to have silent closures such as zips and fastex side release buckles. These items tend to be removed on a regular basis. Night vision goggles, food and weapon cleaning kit are included in this classification.

.

For items that need to be immediately accessed, then such fastening as Velcro and bungy cord may be suitable. Weapon magazines, hand grenades, shell dressings and tourniquets are such items that spring to mind.

.

Bear in mind though, that the operating environment will also have an impact upon pouch closure selection as well.

Operating in small boats in a surf environment may dictate fastex buckle with flap closure pouches to prevent loss of vital mission equipment. Whereas long term operations in the jungle may preclude Velcro closures due to mud and other organic material preventing Velcro from working.

.

My ammunition pouches have had pull tabs added to the flaps to aid in quick opening and set up in such a way as to not encourage snags on vegetation.



Let the mission dictate the gear.

I hope this has been useful. Let me know what you think, I'd be fascinated in hearing any little tricks that you've picked up.
 

22F

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
So it turns out that this article is now a historical document.

This is what winning feels like:- Quiet exultation, tinged with bittersweet sadness.

.

My latest article on fighting order evoked some very interesting responses on one of the Facebook pages I posted it on.

.

Doctrinally, a lot of my ideas are now out of date for the Australian army. In fact, the army has now adopted the Fight Light concept in a huge way.

.

I can’t and won’t claim full credit for this. But I will say that a group I was working with a few years ago (starting before I joined them in 2005) were instrumental in influencing these changes.

.

This discovery makes me feel like a washed-up has-been…..but for all the right reasons. And it’s a wonderful feeling.

.

I’ve been out of the loop awhile now with regards to the service due to real life.

Job loss, arrival of children, job loss again, my marriage imploding, and just for a change – some more job loss.

.

I first started traveling this path back in 2005 because of the pioneering work of the discussion forums Military Kit Review (MKR) and its successor Fire Support Base (FSB).

.

Much criticism of ADF (Australian Defence Force) procurement practices was made at the time. Given the gag order that most serving members are forced to live under, this led to some severe consequences for many who dared to speak out about the deficiencies in personal combat equipment such as body armour, boots, packs and other essentials to a soldiers continued survival and comfort.

.

There were a lot of systemic issues within the ADF and Defence Materials Organization at the time. The issues were many, with a lot of inappropriate behavior for a government organization.

.

Many of you who have “fought the green” know what it’s like to raise issues and call their baby ugly. The system reacts badly to anyone that doesn’t toe the party line.

In fact, it’s still a point of pride that the ADF’s first social media policy was formulated specifically to shut us up.

.

How bad was the reaction from the army towards these allegations?



There were two types of reaction from the Green Machine:



The first response was systemic. The army has a system of product feedback to improve upon in-service equipment, referred to as RODUM’s. At one stage, all submitted RODUM’s for personal equipment were deleted, shredded, mis-directed or simply ignored. Any serving member that dared to submit them would be put through the wringer and suffer negative impacts upon their career.

In addition, on their tours of units and establishments around the country, a great many of our senior leadership deliberately ignored and disregarded any questions or enquiries the troops had on these issues.

.

The second response was a more sinister and personal attack on whistle-blowers.



The original founding member of MKR (C/S Jumpmaster, aka Dayne Simmons) was forced out of the Army – not because of his performance or mindset, but because he had dared ask questions and seek accountability for government processes and procedures. This happens to be a right of any citizen in our nation. Dayne has suffered a great deal mentally and physically, partly because of his service, and partly because of the way he was treated by the service.

.

Other members of MKR and FSB also had their careers and families threatened.

.

I was a civilian working in underground coal mining when a Brigadier called my employer and suggested I wasn’t suitable as an employee because of what I was doing. My boss was used to skulduggery from the unions and shot back that anyone who was willing to do what was right, no matter the consequences – was precisely the sort of employee he wanted.

.

A large misappropriation of Commonwealth assets and resources were expended in an attempt to gag my old mentor Bill Stoate (C/S Caligula) when he setup Fire Support Base to take over the reins from Dayne and Mil Kit Review. Considering that old Bill was 100% Totally Permanently Incapacitated (in a wheelchair sucking on an oxygen bottle) due to his service in Vietnam, it was the height of irony that he ran rings around his opponents, often completely outmanoeuvring them. I shudder to think how much more effective he would have been if his health had been better.

.

It was my old mentor Bill who crystallised the campaign to instigate meaningful change into the ADF procurement systems and operational mindset. He formulated, commenced and executed a multi-pronged campaign. For the first time in this country, a man of the old school used new technology (social media) to influence the ADF.

.

He also supervised a behind the scenes effort to get position papers, statements of requirements and white papers for equipment and processes into the ADF about his analysed requirements. These documents were submitted at Ministerial level, often through influential ADF units to circumvent the obstructionist corporate culture found in the ADF.

.

Involved parties were from all walks of life, all Corps, mustering and ratings. Full time or part time, currently serving or ex-serving. We even had commercial and industry representatives. The effort involved anyone that had relevant knowledge to add.

.

In the classical words of continuous improvement methodology: all stakeholders were consulted.

.

Of course, when a hidebound organization decides to dig in its heels, not much is achieved. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the army vehemently resisted all suggested changes from the troops every step of the way.

.

As we’re all aware, experience in the military is often bought and paid for with blood. It was our hope with Fire Support Base to reduce the cost to our people by shortening that processing time.

.

I’m pretty chuffed that most of the concepts we and so many others started working on in 2005 have been formally adopted. It’s now considered old-hat.

.

It’s absolutely brilliant that this has occurred.

.

There are some lessons to be learned from this whole sorry affair. Primary amongst them is that meaningful change can be effected. But it requires true moral courage. A clear vision and self-determination of what is right must be maintained.

.

In any other country, Dayne and Bill would receive medals for their work, for their unstinting service to the betterment of others. In this country, they were just two broken down veterans, their glory times separated by a lifetime and different worlds. Their common bonds were a belonging to the same Battalion at different points in history. Their biggest bond was a common belief to look after their mates and ensure better outcomes their tribe. Both of these men sacrificed a lot for those simple, lofty ideals that we call mateship. They believed vehemently in looking after their fellow Diggers.

.

I played a very small part it in all, but I wouldn’t have given any of it up for the world.

.

It’s a comfort now, as I gain maturity and turn into a grumpy old fart, that I have served my country in two ways:

• One, as a soldier in the ADF.

• The second in helping to instigate meaningful change into our systems to reduce injury, misery and lost lives.

.

It’s a comfort to look my kids in the eye and tell them that some things in this world are worthy of sacrifice. I can tell them honestly that it’s worth doing the right thing, no matter what.



Not everyone will understand what was done for them, and that’s ok too.

.

I’m a Nigel Nobody in this industry, but I was blessed to walk in the shadow of giants.

.

I’m headed out for some bushwalking next week. I’m planning partaking of a wee dram of the good stuff for a celebratory toast (or two, or ten) of a patrol mate accompanied in spirit by a dead man who didn’t live to see his goals achieved.

.

We’ve done it boys…. we’ve won.

Here’s to Old Faithful.

.

Forward!
 
Last edited:
I found this helpful, thanks! As you said, I'm just as interested in "Webbing"/LBH/LBE/PLCE for carrying hunting or hiking equipment as a citizen's combat/patrol load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22F
Top